Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 148
repealedRioting, armed with deadly weapon
Whoever is guilty of rioting, being armed with a deadly weapon or with anything which, used as a weapon of offence, is likely to cause death, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.
Why this exists
Section 148 is part of the Indian Penal Code's scheme on unlawful assembly and rioting (Sections 141-160). While simple rioting (Section 147) is punished less severely, this section imposes a harsher penalty when rioters carry weapons capable of causing death, because the presence of such weapons makes riots far more dangerous and likely to cause serious injury or death. The law aims to deter armed mobs and treat armed rioting as more serious than unarmed group violence.
How courts read it
Courts have clarified that a 'deadly weapon' need not be a conventional weapon like a sword or gun — everyday objects such as sticks, stones, or farm tools can qualify if used in a manner likely to cause death. Judges have also held that mere presence of a weapon during a riot is not enough; the prosecution must show the accused was part of the unlawful assembly and was armed as described. Courts distinguish this offense from more serious ones like Section 149 (common object) by focusing specifically on the weapon element.
Common misconceptions
- Myth: Only guns or swords count as 'deadly weapons' under this section.
Fact: Courts have held that ordinary objects like sticks, stones, or farming tools can count as deadly weapons if used in a way likely to cause death during the riot. - Myth: Just being present at a riot while holding any object leads to conviction under Section 148.
Fact: The prosecution must prove the person was part of the unlawful assembly (rioting) and was armed with something capable of causing death — mere presence with an unrelated object isn't enough.