114 exam-style questions on this chapter, written from the actual legal text and tagged for UPSC, Judiciary and CLAT. Five are shown below with answers and explanations — the rest are in the free interactive drill.
Q1 · easy · IPC S.141
Under the provision, what is the minimum number of persons required for an assembly to be considered under the definition of an "unlawful assembly"?
- A.Five or more persons✓ correct
- B.Three or more persons
- C.Seven or more persons
- D.Two or more persons
Why: The provision begins, "An assembly of five or more persons is designated an 'unlawful assembly'...", so the minimum number specified is five persons. The wording explicitly refers to assemblies of five or more.
Read Section 141 — Unlawful assembly →Q2 · easy · IPC S.141
According to the provision, an assembly of five or more persons is designated an "unlawful assembly" if:
- A.it contains persons of different religions
- B.the persons composing it have a common object✓ correct
- C.all members are minors
- D.it meets in a public place
Why: The provision states the designation applies "if the common object of the persons composing that assembly is:...", indicating the requirement is that the persons composing the assembly share a common object. Other listed factors are not mentioned in the text.
Read Section 141 — Unlawful assembly →Q3 · medium · IPC S.141
Can an assembly of four persons be designated an "unlawful assembly" under this provision as it is worded?
- A.Yes, assemblies of any size may be designated unlawful
- B.Yes, if they have a violent common object
- C.No, because the provision specifies five or more persons✓ correct
- D.Only if declared unlawful by a magistrate
Why: The provision specifically refers to "An assembly of five or more persons...". Therefore, as worded, assemblies of fewer than five persons (for example four) are not covered by this particular definition.
Read Section 141 — Unlawful assembly →Q4 · medium · IPC S.141
Which of the following is required by the provision to designate an assembly as an "unlawful assembly"?
- A.Either five or more persons or a common object
- B.Only that there is a common object, irrespective of number
- C.Only that there are five or more persons, irrespective of object
- D.Both five or more persons and a common object✓ correct
Why: The provision combines both prerequisites: it begins with "An assembly of five or more persons" and then conditions designation "if the common object of the persons composing that assembly is...". Thus both the number and the common object are required by the wording.
Read Section 141 — Unlawful assembly →Q5 · hard · IPC S.141
According to the exact wording of the provision, which statement correctly captures when an assembly is designated an "unlawful assembly"?
- A.An assembly of five or more persons is designated unlawful only when the persons composing it share a common object✓ correct
- B.Any assembly of five or more persons is unlawful by virtue of its size alone
- C.Any assembly of any size with a common object is unlawful
- D.An assembly is unlawful only if every member personally commits an offence
Why: The provision states: "An assembly of five or more persons is designated an 'unlawful assembly', if the common object of the persons composing that assembly is:...". This shows the assembly must be both of five or more persons and have a common object for the designation to apply.
Read Section 141 — Unlawful assembly →109 more questions on Offences Against The Public Tranquillity
Drill them interactively — instant feedback, links to every provision, and your accuracy tracked on the syllabus map. Free.
Start the free drill →Questions are AI-generated from the legal text, machine-verified against the provision, and editorially reviewable. Education, not legal advice.