सं Samvidhan

We, the people of India

The Constitution,
readable by anyone.

Every Article in its exact legal text and in plain language — with landmark judgments, amendment history and every cross-reference one tap away.

2099 provisions5 laws106 amendments90 landmark cases1371 cross-links

One page. Five ways to read it.

A Supreme Court advocate and a first-time reader use the same page — they just pick a different lens.

Exam prep

Reading is free. Mastery is a game.

10,319+ exam-style questions for UPSC, Judiciary and CLAT — instant feedback that links back to the actual provision, a mastery heatmap of the syllabus, spaced repetition for what you miss, and streaks to keep you honest. Includes the IPC → BNS converter every 2026 aspirant needs.

medium · Article 21

“Procedure established by law” in Article 21 was read to mean a fair, just and reasonable procedure in—

A  A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras
B  Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India ✓
C  Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala

Every answer links to the provision and the case. This one → Article 21.

Meaning lives in case law

Article 21 is one sentence long — privacy, dignity and clean air were read into it by courts. The cases are part of the text's meaning.

2024 · Elections & democracy

Association for Democratic Reforms v. Union of India (Electoral Bonds)

The Supreme Court scrapped the Electoral Bond Scheme, which had let individuals and companies donate secretly to political parties. Judges ruled that voters have a right to know who funds political parties, since hidden funding can influence policies and elections unfairly. The State Bank of India was ordered to reveal who bought and redeemed each bond, making political donations transparent again. This restored public disclosure norms that had existed before the 2018 scheme.

2022 · Gender & personal autonomy

X v. Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Before this ruling, unmarried women were often denied abortions after 20 weeks even in circumstances where married women would qualify, because the law's language seemed to favor married women or victims of rape within marriage only. The Supreme Court said this distinction was unfair and unconstitutional, meaning any woman—married or not—can now seek abortion up to 24 weeks under the same rules if she meets the specified conditions. The Court also recognized that a wife's non-consensual sex with her husband can count as 'rape' for the purpose of granting her an abortion, even though it doesn't create a new criminal offence.

2022 · Equality & reservations

Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India

The Court upheld the government's 2019 law giving a 10% quota in government jobs and college admissions to poorer people from the general (non-SC/ST/OBC) category based on income and asset limits. This means the long-standing rule that total reservations should not exceed 50% is no longer treated as absolute. For ordinary citizens, especially economically weaker upper-caste and other unreserved-category families, this opened a new route to reserved seats, while SC/ST/OBC citizens remain covered by their existing separate quotas.

2020 · Speech & expression

Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India

This judgment made clear that shutting down the internet is not something the government can do indefinitely or in secret. Authorities must now justify such restrictions, publish the orders, and review them periodically, and courts can strike them down if they are excessive. It affirmed that using the internet to speak, work, or do business is part of the fundamental rights every citizen enjoys under the Constitution.

2020 · Gender & personal autonomy

Secretary, Ministry of Defence v. Babita Puniya

This case gave women officers in the Indian Army the right to permanent careers and command positions on the same footing as men, ending a practice where women could only serve for a limited period without long-term career prospects or leadership roles. The Court rejected the government's justifications that women were unsuited for command due to physical or social reasons, calling these outdated stereotypes. As a result, hundreds of women officers became eligible for permanent commission and command postings across the Army.

2018 · Religion, dignity & identity

Indian Young Lawyers Association v. State of Kerala (Sabarimala)

The Supreme Court ruled that Sabarimala temple could not bar women of menstruating age (10-50) from entering, striking down a centuries-old custom. The Court said such exclusion amounted to discrimination and violated women's constitutional rights to equality and worship. The judgment sparked massive protests in Kerala and led to review petitions, with the issue eventually being referred to a larger nine-judge bench for reconsideration of broader questions on religious freedom versus individual rights.

Law in the news, explained

All articles →

Build on the law

The only structured API for the Constitution, BNS, BNSS, BSA and IPC together — every provision, judgment, amendment and cross-reference as clean JSON, verified against official sources and kept current automatically.

curl -H "x-api-key: smv_live_…" \
  samvidhan.co.in/api/v1/articles/21
Plans & documentation →

Built like a source of truth

The Constitution is stored as structured data — every article, clause, amendment and judgment is a typed, linked record. The site rebuilds itself when the law changes: sources are re-fetched, hashed, and only what actually changed is updated.

Last sync: 2026-07-13

  • Exact text, marked provenance

    Legal text is never paraphrased; explainers are visually separate and labelled.

  • Everything is a link

    Cross-references, defined terms, amendments and cases — bidirectional.

  • Developer API

    The full dataset as clean JSON at /api/v1 — a paid product for apps and research.

  • Always current

    Automated sync watches the sources; a change in law changes the site.