सं Samvidhan

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023

Section 71

Service of summons on witness

Why this exists

Under the old Code of Criminal Procedure, summons to witnesses mainly relied on physical delivery, which could be slow, unreliable, or easy to dodge by claiming non-receipt. As courts increasingly used email, SMS, and digital platforms (especially after COVID-19 disrupted physical court processes), the law was updated in BNSS 2023 to formally recognize electronic communication as a valid, simultaneous channel for serving witness summons, alongside registered post, to speed up trials and reduce delays caused by service disputes.

How courts read it

This is a new provision under BNSS 2023, so there isn't yet a body of case law interpreting it directly. It builds on the approach courts had already started taking during the COVID-19 pandemic, when the Supreme Court and various High Courts permitted electronic service of summons and notices as a practical necessity. Courts are likely to continue insisting on clear proof of delivery (such as read receipts, delivery reports, or acknowledgments) before treating electronic service as valid, consistent with how they scrutinized postal acknowledgments under the older Section 69 of the CrPC.

Common misconceptions
  • Myth: A witness summons is only valid if it's handed over in person by a police officer.
    Fact: Under this section, a summons sent by registered post or electronic communication (like email) is also valid, as long as there's proof of delivery or an appropriate acknowledgment.
  • Myth: If a witness ignores an email summons, the case cannot proceed against them.
    Fact: If there's proof the electronic message was delivered, the court can treat the summons as duly served regardless of whether the witness responds.