सं Samvidhan

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023

Section 111

Definitions

Why this exists

As financial crime and money laundering increasingly cross national borders, Indian law needed a framework to cooperate with other countries in tracking, freezing, and confiscating criminal proceeds. This chapter (carried forward from Section 105A of the old Code of Criminal Procedure) sets up that mechanism, and this section fixes the precise meaning of its core vocabulary so that Indian authorities and foreign 'contracting States' interpret terms like 'property' and 'proceeds of crime' consistently.

How courts read it

Since this is a direct re-enactment of erstwhile CrPC Section 105A, courts have generally read these terms broadly and purposively—especially 'property,' which was interpreted expansively in money-laundering and asset-forfeiture cases to include bank accounts, business assets, and even value-equivalent property, not just physical items directly traceable to a crime. No major Supreme Court ruling specifically reinterprets this definitions clause differently under the new BNSS, as it mirrors settled law.

Common misconceptions
  • Myth: 'Property' here only means land or buildings.
    Fact: The definition is very broad and includes money, documents, digital assets, and any other kind of asset connected to a crime.
  • Myth: Any foreign country automatically qualifies as a 'contracting State.'
    Fact: Only countries with which India's Central Government has made a specific treaty or arrangement count as 'contracting States.'