सं Samvidhan

The Constitution of India

Article 55

Manner of election of President

Why this exists

The framers wanted the President to be elected by both Parliament and the state legislatures together, reflecting India's federal character. But states differ hugely in population and number of MLAs, so a simple one-MLA-one-vote system would let small states or thinly populated legislatures wield disproportionate power. Article 55's formula converts population and assembly size into standardized 'vote values' so that, as closely as practicable, each state's real demographic weight is reflected, while also balancing the states collectively against Parliament. Freezing the population figure at the 1971 census (later extended to 2026) was a deliberate policy choice, tied to family-planning goals, so that states pursuing population control weren't penalized with reduced political weight for succeeding at it.

How courts read it

There is no major Supreme Court case reinterpreting the mechanics of Article 55 itself, since it is a self-contained mathematical formula rather than a source of ambiguous rights language. Courts have occasionally referenced it in passing while discussing the federal structure of presidential elections and the Election Commission's role in conducting them, but its practical application has mostly been handled through delegated legislation (the Presidential and Vice-Presidential Elections Act, 1952) and Election Commission notifications rather than litigation.

Common misconceptions
  • Myth: The President is elected directly by ordinary citizens, like the Prime Minister's party is chosen by voters.
    Fact: The President is elected indirectly, only by elected MPs and MLAs, using the weighted vote-value formula in Article 55 — ordinary citizens don't vote directly in this election.
  • Myth: Using the 1971 census means Article 55 is outdated and ignores real population changes.
    Fact: The freeze at the 1971 census (extended toward 2026) was a deliberate constitutional choice to avoid penalizing states for successful population control, not an oversight.
  • Myth: Every MLA across India has the same voting power in a presidential election.
    Fact: Vote value differs sharply by state, since it's calculated from each state's 1971 population divided by its number of elected MLAs.