39 exam-style questions on this chapter, written from the actual legal text and tagged for UPSC, Judiciary and CLAT. Five are shown below with answers and explanations — the rest are in the free interactive drill.
Q1 · easy · IPC S.503
Which of the following is an essential element of 'criminal intimidation' under Section 503, IPC?
- A.Actual injury must have been inflicted on the person threatened.
- B.A threat of injury to person, reputation or property with intent to cause alarm or to compel an act/omission.✓ correct
- C.Only threats to property constitute criminal intimidation.
- D.The threat must be given in writing to amount to criminal intimidation.
Why: Section 503 states that whoever "threatens another with any injury to his person, reputation or property... with intent to cause alarm to that person, or to cause that person to do any act... or to omit to do any act... commits criminal intimidation." The provision requires a threatening communication plus the specified intent, not actual infliction of injury or a written form.
Read Section 503 — Criminal intimidation →Q2 · easy · IPC S.503
Does Section 503 cover a threat against the reputation of a person in whom the threatened person is interested?
- A.Yes, threats to the person or reputation of any one in whom that person is interested are included.✓ correct
- B.No, only the threatened person's own reputation is protected.
- C.Only if the person in whom he is interested is a relative.
- D.Only if property of that interested person is also threatened.
Why: Section 503 expressly includes threats "to the person or reputation of any one in whom that person is interested," so a threat to the reputation of such a third person is covered. The text does not limit this to relatives or require property to be threatened.
Read Section 503 — Criminal intimidation →Q3 · medium · IPC S.503
A threatens B intending to cause alarm to C (a third person), but B himself is not intended to be alarmed. Does this fall within Section 503?
- A.Yes — causing alarm to any person is sufficient.
- B.Yes — if C is related to B.
- C.No — the provision requires intent "to cause alarm to that person" (the person threatened).✓ correct
- D.Only if B later suffers actual injury.
Why: Section 503 requires the threat to be "with intent to cause alarm to that person," referring to the person threatened. A threat intended only to alarm a third party does not satisfy that element. The provision does not require actual injury for the offence.
Read Section 503 — Criminal intimidation →Q4 · hard · IPC S.503
A threatens to damage the property of B (a third person) in order to coerce C, who is interested in B. Does Section 503 criminalise this threat?
- A.Yes — any threat to property amounts to criminal intimidation under Section 503.
- B.No — Section 503 only extends to the person or reputation of any one in whom the threatened person is interested, not that person's property.✓ correct
- C.Yes — but only if C stands to lose a legal right over B's property.
- D.No — property threats are never covered by Section 503.
Why: Section 503 lists threats to "his person, reputation or property," and separately includes "to the person or reputation of any one in whom that person is interested." It does not mention the property of a third person in whom the threatened person is interested, so a threat to a third party's property is not covered by that specific phrase.
Read Section 503 — Criminal intimidation →Q5 · easy · IPC S.504
Which mental state is required under Section 504 of the IPC for the offender regarding the likelihood that the provocation will cause a breach of the public peace or another offence?
- A.Only the intention to insult the person
- B.Intending or knowing it to be likely that such provocation will cause him to break the public peace or to commit any other offence✓ correct
- C.Only knowledge that the insult will offend the person
- D.No specific mental state is required
Why: Section 504 requires that the offender intentionally insults and does so 'intending or knowing it to be likely that such provocation will cause him to break the public peace, or to commit any other offence.' Thus the provision demands either intention or knowledge about the likelihood of breach or offence.
Read Section 504 — Intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of the peace →34 more questions on Criminal Intimidation, Insult And Annoyance
Drill them interactively — instant feedback, links to every provision, and your accuracy tracked on the syllabus map. Free.
Start the free drill →Questions are AI-generated from the legal text, machine-verified against the provision, and editorially reviewable. Education, not legal advice.