156 exam-style questions on this chapter, written from the actual legal text and tagged for UPSC, Judiciary and CLAT. Five are shown below with answers and explanations — the rest are in the free interactive drill.
Q1 · easy · IPC S.463
Under Section 463 IPC, which of the following best describes the act of forgery?
- A.Making any false document or false electronic record or part thereof with one of the specified intents (e.g., to cause damage, support a claim, or commit fraud).✓ correct
- B.Merely possessing a false document or false electronic record.
- C.Making a true document but intending to conceal it from authorities.
- D.Printing multiple genuine copies of a public document.
Why: Section 463 states that forgery is committed by whoever makes any false document or false electronic record or part of a document or electronic record with specified intents. Possession alone or making true documents are not described as forgery in this provision.
Read Section 463 — Forgery →Q2 · easy · IPC S.463
Does Section 463 IPC cover electronic records as a subject matter of forgery?
- A.No, it applies only to physical documents.
- B.Only if the electronic record is printed out.
- C.Yes, it expressly includes false electronic records and parts of electronic records.✓ correct
- D.Only if the electronic record is stored on government servers.
Why: The provision expressly mentions 'false electronic record' and 'part of a... electronic record', so electronic records are included within the scope of forgery under Section 463. There is no requirement in the text about printing or storage location.
Read Section 463 — Forgery →Q3 · medium · IPC S.463
If a person makes only a part of a document false but does so without any intention to cause damage, support a claim, cause someone to part with property, induce a contract, or commit fraud, does Section 463 IPC classify that act as forgery?
- A.Yes, making any part false is forgery regardless of intent.
- B.No, Section 463 requires one of the specified intents in addition to making a false part.✓ correct
- C.Yes, because altering any part of a document always supports a claim.
- D.No, unless the document is a public document.
Why: Section 463 requires both the making of a false document or part and an intent such as to cause damage, support a claim, cause parting with property, induce a contract, or commit fraud. Absent one of those specified intents, the provision does not classify the act as forgery.
Read Section 463 — Forgery →Q4 · medium · IPC S.463
A person creates a false document with the aim of supporting a title claim. Under Section 463 IPC, is this act forgery?
- A.No, supporting a title claim is not mentioned in Section 463.
- B.Only if the title claim involves public land.
- C.Yes, supporting any claim or title is specifically listed as an intent that makes the making of a false document forgery.✓ correct
- D.Only if the claimant relies on the document in court.
Why: Section 463 includes 'to support any claim or title' among the intents which, when combined with making a false document or electronic record, constitute forgery. The provision does not limit this to public land or require court reliance.
Read Section 463 — Forgery →Q5 · hard · IPC S.463
Which statement correctly captures the mental element regarding fraud in Section 463 IPC?
- A.Section 463 requires intent to actually commit a specific fraud and nothing less.
- B.Section 463 requires only negligence regarding possible fraud.
- C.Section 463 covers both intent to commit fraud and intent that fraud may be committed; the latter possibility is sufficient.✓ correct
- D.Section 463 requires that fraud must have been completed for forgery to be made out.
Why: The text of Section 463 states forgery is committed when a false document is made 'with intent to commit fraud or that fraud may be committed', so an intention that fraud may be committed is sufficient. The provision does not require actual completion of the fraud.
Read Section 463 — Forgery →151 more questions on Offences Relating To Documents And To Property Marks
Drill them interactively — instant feedback, links to every provision, and your accuracy tracked on the syllabus map. Free.
Start the free drill →Questions are AI-generated from the legal text, machine-verified against the provision, and editorially reviewable. Education, not legal advice.