सं Samvidhan

Indian Penal Code, 1860

Section 23

repealed

Wrongful gain

Why this exists

Section 23 is part of the IPC's definitions chapter, drafted under Thomas Macaulay's Law Commission in the mid-1800s. The drafters wanted precise, reusable definitions so that later sections (like those on theft, cheating, and criminal breach of trust) wouldn't need to redefine basic ideas every time. 'Wrongful gain' and its counterpart 'wrongful loss' work as a pair: one person's unlawful gain often corresponds to another's unlawful loss, and together they help define 'dishonestly' under Section 24.

How courts read it

Courts have generally used this definition as a building block rather than a standalone offence. In R.K. Dalmia v. Delhi Administration (1962), the Supreme Court examined the scope of 'property' in the context of wrongful gain and loss while interpreting criminal breach of trust, holding that the term should be read broadly to include various forms of property, not just physical movable goods. Judges typically apply this definition alongside Sections 24 (dishonestly) and 415 (cheating) rather than analyzing it in isolation.

Common misconceptions
  • Myth: Wrongful gain only means stealing physical objects like cash or jewelry.
    Fact: Courts have read 'property' broadly under this definition, and it can extend to other forms of property or benefits, not just physical goods, depending on how it's used in specific offences like criminal breach of trust.
  • Myth: Section 23 itself is a punishable offence.
    Fact: This section only defines a term; it doesn't create a crime by itself. It's used to interpret other IPC sections like cheating (415) and dishonesty (24).