सं Samvidhan

Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023

Section 78

Presumption as to genuineness of certified copies

Why this exists

Government offices produce huge numbers of certificates and certified copies (like land records, birth certificates, or court orders) that are used as evidence every day. Requiring proof of genuineness for every single one would clog courts and delay justice. This provision, carried forward from Section 79 of the old Indian Evidence Act, 1872, allows courts to trust properly certified official documents at face value, while still allowing a party to challenge them if there's real doubt.

How courts read it

Under the predecessor provision (Section 79 of the Evidence Act, 1872), courts have held that the presumption of genuineness applies only when the document substantially follows the form and manner prescribed by law — it is not an absolute or irrebuttable presumption, and can be challenged with evidence showing forgery or lack of proper authority.

Common misconceptions
  • Myth: Once a document is certified by a government officer, it can never be questioned in court.
    Fact: The presumption of genuineness can be challenged and rebutted with evidence; it is a starting assumption, not a final, unchallengeable fact.
  • Myth: Any government-related paper automatically qualifies for this presumption.
    Fact: The document must be one the law specifically allows as evidence, and it must be substantially in the correct legal form and manner — not just any government paperwork.