सं Samvidhan

Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023

Section 75

Certified copies of public documents

Why this exists

This provision continues a rule first codified in the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (Section 76), carried forward almost verbatim into the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023. Public records—land registers, court orders, birth certificates, government notifications—are often needed as proof in disputes, but originals cannot be handed out or risked in every courtroom. The law therefore lets certified copies stand in for originals, provided they are properly authenticated by the custodian officer, ensuring reliability while protecting the original record.

How courts read it

Courts have long held that a 'certified copy' under this provision (and its predecessor Section 76 of the Evidence Act) is admissible as secondary evidence of the document's contents without needing to produce the original, provided the certifying officer had actual custody and followed the prescribed format—signature, date, official title, and seal where applicable. Judgments have emphasized that defects in certification (e.g., missing seal or wrong officer) can affect evidentiary value, and that the 'right to inspect' must genuinely exist under some other law before this section's duty to supply a copy arises.

Common misconceptions
  • Myth: Anyone can demand a certified copy of any government document.
    Fact: The law only requires this if the person already has a legal right to inspect that particular document under some other law or rule.
  • Myth: A photocopy from a government office is automatically a 'certified copy.'
    Fact: It becomes a certified copy only when the authorized officer adds the dated certificate, signature, official title, and seal (where applicable) as required by this section.