The Magistrate can just verbally tell someone to deposit a bond without any written explanation.

The law requires a written order clearly stating the facts, bond amount, duration, and number of sureties — courts have struck down orders that skip these specifics.

Any person can be accepted as a surety without scrutiny.

The Magistrate must specifically consider whether the proposed sureties are sufficient and fit (reliable) before finalizing the order.

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023

Section 130

Order to be made

When a Magistrate acting under section 126, section 127, section 128 or section 129, deems it necessary to require any person to show cause under such section, he shall make an order in writing, setting forth the substance of the information received, the amount of the bond to be executed, the term for which it is to be in force and the number of sureties, after considering the sufficiency and fitness of sureties.§

Why this exists

This provision continues a long-standing safeguard (earlier found in Section 111 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973) meant to prevent arbitrary or vague preventive-detention-like orders. Sections 126 to 129 allow Magistrates to demand bonds from people believed likely to breach peace, repeat offences, or engage in certain undesirable conduct. Because such orders restrict personal liberty even without a full trial, the law requires the Magistrate to record clear, specific reasons and terms in writing — ensuring transparency, giving the person fair notice, and creating a record for any future appeal.

How courts read it

Courts, interpreting the identical predecessor provision (Section 111 CrPC), have consistently held that the written order is not a mere formality. It must disclose the actual material or specific facts underlying the apprehension, not vague or general allegations, since the person must know precisely what case they must meet. Superior courts have quashed orders that only reproduced statutory language without stating real facts, treating this as essential to natural justice under Article 21.

Common misconceptions

Myth: The Magistrate can just verbally tell someone to deposit a bond without any written explanation.
Fact: The law requires a written order clearly stating the facts, bond amount, duration, and number of sureties — courts have struck down orders that skip these specifics.
Myth: Any person can be accepted as a surety without scrutiny.
Fact: The Magistrate must specifically consider whether the proposed sureties are sufficient and fit (reliable) before finalizing the order.