सं Samvidhan

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023

Section 124

Voluntarily causing grievous hurt by use of acid, etc

Why this exists

This section was introduced in response to a rising number of acid attack cases in India, particularly targeting women, which often caused severe lifelong physical and psychological damage but were previously punished under general 'grievous hurt' provisions with lighter sentences. Following public outcry and Supreme Court directions (notably in Laxmi v. Union of India, which also led to regulation of acid sales), a specific, stringent law was created—first as Sections 326A and 326B of the Indian Penal Code via the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013, and now carried forward as Section 124 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023—to ensure acid violence is treated as a distinct, serious crime with mandatory minimum sentences and victim-focused compensation.

How courts read it

Under the predecessor provisions (IPC Sections 326A and 326B), courts emphasized that the fine imposed must genuinely be adequate for the victim's ongoing medical treatment, including reconstructive surgeries, and that compensation should not be treated as a mere formality. Courts have also held that consent or fault of the victim is irrelevant once acid is used with the requisite intention or knowledge, and that attempts to throw or administer acid are punishable even if the acid does not make contact or cause injury, given the potential severity of harm. These interpretive principles are expected to continue guiding courts under the renumbered Section 124.

Common misconceptions
  • Myth: The law only applies if acid actually touches the victim and causes visible injury.
    Fact: Sub-section (2) also punishes attempts—like trying to throw or administer acid—even if it doesn't reach or injure the victim, because of the serious risk involved.
  • Myth: Only liquid acid counts under this law.
    Fact: Explanation 1 clarifies that 'acid' includes any corrosive or burning substance capable of causing scarring or disability, not just chemical acid in liquid form.
  • Myth: The damage must be permanent and irreversible for this section to apply.
    Fact: Explanation 2 states that permanent or partial damage, deformity, or vegetative state need not be irreversible—temporary but serious harm can still qualify.
  • Myth: The fine imposed is paid to the government as a penalty.
    Fact: The law specifically requires that any fine under sub-section (1) be paid to the victim, not the state, to help cover medical expenses.