सं Samvidhan

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023

Section 119

Voluntarily causing hurt or grievous hurt to extort property, or to constrain to an illegal

Why this exists

This provision continues the logic of the old Indian Penal Code (Sections 327 and 329), which recognized that extortion or coercion becomes far more dangerous when physical violence is used as the tool. Ordinary extortion (through threats) is punished separately; this section specifically targets cases where actual bodily harm is inflicted to force compliance, treating it as a more serious offence because it combines two wrongs — violence and coercion.

How courts read it

Under the earlier IPC provisions (Sections 327 and 329), courts consistently held that the prosecution must prove both the act of causing hurt or grievous hurt AND the specific illegal purpose (extortion or forcing illegal conduct) behind it. Courts have clarified that mere hurt without proof of this extortive or coercive intent falls under ordinary hurt provisions, not this special one. Judgments have also distinguished 'hurt' from 'grievous hurt' based on medical evidence, affecting which sub-section and punishment applies.

Common misconceptions
  • Myth: This law only applies if property was actually taken.
    Fact: The law applies even if the extortion attempt fails — the crime is in causing hurt *for the purpose* of extortion, not in successfully getting the property.
  • Myth: Any hurt during a robbery or fight counts under this law.
    Fact: Courts require proof that the hurt was specifically intended to extort property or force illegal conduct — hurt caused during an unrelated fight or accident doesn't qualify.