सं Samvidhan

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023

Section 113

Terrorist act

Why this exists

India has faced numerous terrorist attacks — bombings, hijackings, targeted killings, kidnappings for ransom or political leverage, and financing networks — that ordinary criminal law (murder, kidnapping, property damage) did not fully capture in terms of intent, scale, and organized nature. Earlier laws like TADA and POTA (both repealed after misuse concerns) and the still-existing UAPA, 1967 dealt with such acts. When India replaced the Indian Penal Code with the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, it inserted a dedicated 'terrorist act' provision (Section 113) directly into the general criminal code for the first time, defining terrorism broadly — covering explosives, chemical/biological/nuclear threats, attacks on currency stability, and coercive kidnappings — while also criminalizing the wider ecosystem of terrorism: financing, training, recruitment, membership, and harbouring.

Common misconceptions
  • Myth: Terrorism under this law only means bombings or shootings.
    Fact: The law also covers things like counterfeiting currency to hurt the economy, kidnapping to pressure a government, and using biological or chemical substances — not just explosives or firearms.
  • Myth: Any violent protest or riot automatically counts as a terrorist act.
    Fact: The section requires a specific intent (or likelihood) to threaten India's unity, security, or economic stability, or to spread terror — ordinary violence or unrest without this intent does not automatically qualify.
  • Myth: Helping a terrorist's spouse hide them is also a crime under subsection (6).
    Fact: The law specifically exempts spouses from punishment for harbouring or concealing an offender.