Article 211

This provision protects judicial independence by preventing state legislators from putting pressure on judges through open criticism or debate on the floor of the House. Judges must decide cases based on law and facts, without fear of being publicly targeted by politicians for their rulings. The only constitutionally sanctioned way to examine a judge's conduct is the formal removal process (impeachment under Articles 124 and 217, involving Parliament, not state legislatures), which requires a proven case of misbehaviour or incapacity before a special majority vote.

• Myth: Article 211 means judges can never be criticized or questioned by anyone in government.
  Fact: It only stops discussion in the state legislature itself; judges can still be removed through the formal impeachment process in Parliament, and their judgments can be appealed or publicly discussed in other lawful ways.
• Myth: This article applies to any court official or government officer.
  Fact: It specifically covers Supreme Court and High Court judges, not other judicial or quasi-judicial officers.